The Top 3 Leadership Styles In Management & How To Identify Them
Introduction
Developing into a proficient leader starts by recognizing and honing your unique approach to leadership. The efficacy of a leadership style highly depends on the disposition and your team’s reactions to diverse management strategies.
As you evolve, your leadership approach is prone to transformation as you discern what works and what does not for yourself and your team. Hence, it is crucial to understand how different styles yield varied outcomes and integrate them to suit your team’s unique requirements and hurdles.
The book Elevate Your Leadership: 10 Leadership Styles for Every Situation by VERSAtile Reads uncovers the nuances of each style and elevate your leadership potential to navigate any scenario effectively.
In this blog, we dive deeper into some common management leadership styles, dissecting their merits and demerits.
How to Identify a Leadership Style?
Defining leadership style proves to be a multifaceted task due to the myriad interpretations available. Furthermore, leaders often blend diverse styles influenced by their traits, workplace dynamics, and operational settings, complicating pinpointing a precise definition.
A leader’s style is ultimately shaped by managing and communicating with followers. The primary hallmark of a successful leader resides in their capacity to guide, motivate, and oversee individuals. Self-awareness stands as a critical asset for leaders, aiding in comprehending the rationale behind both triumphs and setbacks and fostering informed decisions for growth.
Adaptability is integral to effective leadership, especially in the context of ongoing organizational shifts prevalent since the onset of the pandemic. Organizations must acknowledge that leadership skills can be cultivated through training.
Now, let’s explore the three major leadership styles to help you identify which type of leader you are.
The Best Leadership Styles in Management
In 1939, Kurt Lewin delineated three distinct leadership styles in business: autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire, each carrying its inherent strengths and weaknesses.
-
The Autocratic Leader
An autocratic leader wields authority with conviction, eschewing the group’s involvement in decision-making. They prefer solitary leadership, expecting strict adherence to their directives from those under their purview.
Advantages of Autocratic Leadership
Efficiency and productivity thrive under autocratic leadership due to streamlined work processes, clear expectations, and stringent deadlines. This style is particularly effective in crises or situations requiring swift decisions, minimizing misunderstandings by offering explicit instructions.
Disadvantages of Autocratic Leadership
Their restricted outlook, stemming from reliance solely on personal ideas and experiences, tends to dismiss input from team members. Subordinates may feel undervalued due to insufficient recognition of their contributions, fostering resentment. Moreover, these leaders often lean toward micromanagement, leading to low morale and high turnover rates among team members.
Autocratic Management Style
- Centralized Decision-Making
Autocratic managers retain the authority to make decisions unilaterally. They do not delegate decision-making power to the team and maintain centralized control.
- Clear Chain of Command
Autocratic Management often relies on a clear hierarchical structure. There is a well-defined chain of command, with the manager at the top making decisions that cascade to the rest of the team.
- Efficiency in Decision-Making
Autocratic managers can make decisions quickly without prolonged discussions or consensus-building. This can be beneficial in situations that require swift action.
- Authoritarian Leadership
Autocratic managers exhibit an authoritative and directive leadership style. They give instructions and expect compliance without seeking input from others.
When to Use this Style
Autocratic leadership proves beneficial in crises, where decisive leadership is imperative for quick decision-making. Teams often appreciate a strong and assertive leader during emergencies. It can also be effective for corrective measures within a team. However, transitioning to other leadership styles after the crisis is advisable.
-
The Democratic Leader
A democratic leader fosters an environment conducive to open idea exchange within the team. Every member’s input holds value, while the leader assumes the role of a spokesperson or facilitator. This leadership style relies on all team members’ active participation, highlighting each individual’s unique expertise. All team members share both the freedoms and responsibilities inherent in leadership.
Advantages of Democratic Leadership
Democratic leadership thrives on the limitless creativity stemming from collective input, fostering open discussions on issues and solutions. Team unity typically flourishes under this approach, making employees feel appreciated, accomplished, and integral to the organization’s success. Office politics like gossip, cliques, and manipulation diminish significantly. Consequently, the work environment improves, reducing employee turnover 63% of recognized employees are less inclined to seek other job opportunities.
Disadvantages of Democratic Leadership
In situations demanding swift decisions, the deliberative nature of democratic leadership might pose challenges. The team may need help to adapt and function effectively under stress. Additionally, this style can sometimes create ambiguity around team roles and responsibilities, making it challenging to identify underperforming employees.
When to Use this Style
This approach is most effective for routine work, allowing the team to make decisions. It fosters a sense of ownership among teams regarding projects, deliverables, and outcomes. While many business leaders favor the democratic style, it may be less effective during crises.
-
The Laissez-Faire Leader
Laissez-faire leaders adopt a hands-off approach, delegating tasks and offering general guidance while remaining detached mainly from day-to-day operations. Employees are entrusted with determining the best methods to fulfill their duties. These leaders place significant trust in individuals, relying on their self-motivation, focus, and accountability. Leaders are available for guidance in case of issues, but only when requested. They permit each team member to thrive or falter based on their abilities.
Advantages of Laissez-Faire Leadership
The freedom from managerial constraints or interference is a key advantage, enabling skilled and self-motivated employees to unleash their full potential.
Disadvantages of Laissez-Faire Leadership
However, productivity may improve with strong leadership oversight, leading to missed deadlines, process omissions, and subpar work quality. Individualized goal pursuit can impede team unity, and a perceived lack of engagement from leaders may lead to employee disinterest, potentially causing significant organizational losses.
When to Use this Style
Laissez-faire leadership is best suited for self-sufficient individuals capable of functioning without direct supervision. Before adopting this style, it’s crucial to ensure each team member possesses the necessary skill level and self-driven capability to maintain motivation and productivity. Otherwise, this approach could prove counterproductive.
Conclusion
The best leadership and management styles depend on the situation and the collective requirements of the team and the broader company. Your most suitable style also aligns with your traits.
FAQs
- How many types of leadership styles are there?
There are various management and leadership styles at a level of business, commonly categorized into three main types: autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire.
- What are the two basic types of leadership?
Leadership is often divided into two fundamental types: task-oriented, focusing on goals and efficiency, and people-oriented, emphasizing relationships and team dynamics.
- What factors influence the choice of a leadership style?
Personal traits, team dynamics, organizational culture, and the nature of tasks or projects influence leadership styles. Individual preferences, situational demands, and the team’s needs are pivotal in determining the most effective style.
- Can a leader switch between different leadership styles?
Yes, leaders can adapt their styles based on circumstances. Influential leaders often blend styles, transitioning between autocratic, democratic, or laissez-faire approaches as situations warrant, ensuring better alignment with team requirements.
- Are certain leadership styles more effective in specific industries?
Different industries might benefit from particular leadership styles. For example, creative sectors like design or advertising might favor democratic styles, while highly structured industries like finance might lean toward autocratic approaches. However, adaptability remains crucial in any industry.
